wonder if they would say anything if they were forced to stick to actual facts...seems as if the best way to obscure the facts is to drown them out with rhetoric, failing that the next best thing is to say a lot where it doesn't matter.
why is it that Rice has so much to say to the press, but nothing to say under oath.
why is it that Scalia seems to have no real understanding of why so many people are upset over his refusal to recuse himself.
how come approving 173 judges nominations, and blocking 6, means that the democrats are set against the white houses judicial appointments.
how is it that speaking out in any way against this administrations policies means that the person doing so has a political agenda,even when it is a republican doing the speaking, yet nothing said by the administration has a political agenda.
Posted by Angstman at March 27, 2004 07:53 AM | TrackBack